Performance appraisals are different from the typical standardized test in that the ''test" in this case is a combination of the scale and the person who completes the rating. The question of which performance dimensions to evaluate tended to be taken as a given.Īlthough, strictly speaking, we do not disagree with the test analogy for performance appraisals, it can be misleading. The research addressed two issues almost exclusively-the nature and quality of the scales to be used to assess performance and rater training. The emphasis throughout was on reducing rating errors, which was assumed to improve the accuracy of measurement. Performance appraisals were viewed in much the same way as tests that is to say, they were evaluated against criteria of validity, reliability, and freedom from bias. The implicit assumption of many applied researchers is that if the tools and procedures are acceptable and useful, they are also likely to be sufficiently accurate from a measurement standpoint.įrom a historical perspective, until the last decade research on performance appraisal was largely dominated by the measurement tradition. For example, the scholarship in the management literature looks at the use of performance appraisal systems to reinforce organizational and employee belief systems. They have concerned themselves less with questions of validity and reliability than with the workability of the performance appraisal system within the organization, its ability to communicate organizational standards to employees, to reward good performers, and to identify employees who require training and other development activities. Resources management, organizational sociology, and more recently applied psychology, have focused their efforts on usability and acceptability of performance appraisal tools and procedures. In a somewhat different vein, scholars in the more applied fields-human Much has been learned, but as this summary of the field makes explicit, there is still a long way to go. By and large, researchers in measurement have made the assumption that if the tools and procedures are accurate (e.g., valid and reliable), then the functional goals of organizations using tests or performance appraisals will be met. Psychologists have striven to develop definitive measures of job performance, on the theory that accurate job analysis and measurement instruments would provide both employer and employee with a better understanding of what is expected and a knowledge of whether the employee's performance has been effective. Within the measurement tradition, emanating from psychometrics and testing, researchers have worked and continue to work on the premise that accurate measurement is a precondition for understanding and accurate evaluation.
Although all performance appraisal systems encompass both goals, they are reflected differently in two major research orientations, one that grows out of the measurement tradition, the other from human resources management and other fields that focus on the organizational purposes of performance appraisal. Bob Feldman still remembers those moments of being overwhelmed when he started college at Wesleyan University.The science of performance appraisal is directed toward two fundamental goals: to create a measure that accurately assesses the level of an individual's job performance and to create an evaluation system that will advance one or more operational functions in an organization. Because virtually every paragraph in the previous edition is tied to several questions students answer in LearnSmart, the author was able to see where students struggled most The 12th edition continues with Feldman's accessible pedagogy and hallmark research, as well as his modules-within-chapters format that is both manageable for students and allows every professor the flexibility to assign and cover what they want. Designed for student success, Feldman provides students with a powerful learning framework to help them connect, engage, and feel excited about psychology. PAYPAL allows anyone to pay in any way they prefer through credit cards, bank accounts, account balances or buyer credit without sharing financial information. Please intimate us a return tracking number for faster refunds. Understanding Psychology by Feldman, Robert S.
0 kommentar(er)
